Entries from blog.bioethics.net tagged with 'gene therapy'

A comment from Paul Gelsinger on gene therapy and informed consent

In a guest post earlier this week Alan Milstein, the attorney who represented Jesse Gelsinger's family, wrote about his reaction to a recent editorial by James Wilson about gene therapy and informed consent in the journal Human Gene Therapy. The guest post prompted a number of comments, including one from... (read the rest)

On gene therapy and informed consent

By Alan Milstein January’s issue of Human Gene Therapy offers some intriguing commentary on the issue of informed consent in gene transfer trials. I became aware of the articles when a writer for TheScientist Blog called for my reaction to the Editorial by James Wilson, because I had represented the... (read the rest)

Art Caplan at MSNBC: Giving up on gene therapy is wrong reaction

Art writes that the death of Jolee Mohr should lead to new patient protections: The recent death of Jolee Mohr is likely to have a seismic impact on the future of gene therapy research. Biotech companies, private investors and government funders will shy away from sponsoring further research because Mohr... (read the rest)

feed these results

If you use an RSS reader, you can subscribe to a feed of all future entries from blog.bioethics.net tagged 'gene therapy'. [What is this?]

Subscribe to feed Subscribe to feed

tags from blog.bioethics.net

abortion (9)

Abraham Lincoln (1)

academia (8)

academic publishing (6)

addiction (3)

Africa (2)

aging (2)

agriculture (1)

airlines (1)

AJOB (22)

AJOB Neuroscience (1)

AJOB Primary Research (1)

alcohol (1)

allergies (1)

ALS (1)

Alta Charo (1)

AMA (2)

American Journal of Bioethics (6)

Andrew Wakefield (1)

animals (16)

anorexia (1)

anthrax (1)

APA (1)

archaeology (1)

Art Caplan (26)

artificial intelligence (2)

ASBH (3)

assisted reproduction (1)

athletics (1)

autism (9)

award (1)

Barack Obama (1)

basic research (1)

beyond genetics (1)

bias (1)

BIID (1)

BioEdge (1)

bioethics (32)

bioethics.net (17)

biotechnology (6)

bioterrorism (1)

birth weight (1)

blog.bioethics.net (10)

blogs (3)

BMJ (2)

book (1)

brain-computer interface (1)

breast cancer (4)

Britain (1)

business ethics (1)

cadavers (1)

California (2)

Canada (1)

cancer (3)

caregiver (1)

Catholic chuch (3)

CDC (2)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1)

cessation (1)

cheating (1)

chemistry (1)

chemotherapy (2)

children (31)

chimeras (5)

China (6)

chocolate (1)

Christian (1)

cigarettes (1)

civil rights (1)

clinical ethics (5)

clinical trials (8)

cloning (18)

Coast IRB (1)

COBRA (1)

commission (2)

conferences (1)

conflict of interest (6)

consumer (1)

contraception (1)

cord blood (1)

cosmetic surgery (4)

cosmetics (1)

courts (1)

CPR (1)

Craig Venter (8)

crime (1)

databases (3)

death (4)

death penalty (5)

dementia (1)

democracy (1)

Democrats (1)

dental health (1)

developing countries (7)

development (1)

devices (1)

diabetes (1)

disability (1)

diversity (1)

DNA (4)

DNR (2)

doctors (41)

donation (1)

drug abuse (2)

e-card (1)

eating disorders (1)

economics (3)

education (1)

egg donation (5)

eggs for research (1)

elderly (1)

election 2008 (15)

electronic health records (1)

Elsevier (4)

embryos (13)

emergencies (2)

emergency research (1)

empirical bioethics (2)

employment (1)

end of life (4)

enhancement (25)

environment (3)

epidemics (1)

epidemiology (2)

ethical (1)

ethicist (2)

ethics (28)

Europe (1)

euthanasia (3)

evolution (3)

exercise (1)

Ezekiel Emanuel (1)

face (1)

facebook (4)

families (3)

FDA (18)

federalism (2)

fertility tourism (1)

flight simulators (1)

fMRI (2)

following up (1)

food (17)

food ethics (6)

forensics (1)

funding (2)

games (1)

gay rights (1)

gender (4)

gender theory (1)

gene therapy (3)

genetic disease (9)

genetic engineering (1)

genetic modification (5)

genetic testing (26)

genetics (24)

genomics (12)

Geron (1)

glenn mcgee (2)

Glenn McGee (15)

Google (1)

government (5)

Harvard (2)

healing (1)

health (16)

health 2.0 (1)

health insurance (27)

health reform (18)

healthcare (40)

hearing (1)

heart attack (2)

HIV/AIDS (3)

holocaust (1)

hospitals (8)

human rights (1)

humanities (1)

humans (1)

Hurricane Katrina (1)

Hwang Woo-suk (2)

Ian Wilmut (1)

illness (1)

industry (7)

infants (1)

infectious disease (12)

influenza (18)

informed consent (3)

injury (1)

Institute of Medicine (1)

insurance (2)

international (7)

internet (8)

interview (1)

iphone (2)

iPS cells (19)

Iran (1)

IRB (2)

IVF (2)

James Fossett (1)

John McCain (1)

Johns Hopkins (2)

Johns Hopkins University (1)

Joseph Biden (3)

journalism (2)

Kevorkian (2)

kidneys (2)

law (15)

legislation (2)

Leon Kass (1)

liberty (1)

license (1)

living donors (1)

longevity (2)

lying (1)

March of Dimes (1)

Marfan syndrome (1)

marriage (1)

massage (1)

masters degree (1)

media (13)

medical devices (5)

medical education (3)

medical ethics (10)

medical marijuana (2)

medical schools (11)

Medicare (2)

medicine (5)

memory (1)

mental illness (2)

MercatorNet (1)

Merck (4)

military (1)

Mitt Romney (1)

mobile (1)

models (2)

money (3)

Montana (1)

morality (3)

multiple births (1)

nanotechnology (18)

neuroethics (20)

neuroimaging (2)

neuromarketing (2)

neuroscience (27)

New York (1)

news (1)

news top 5 (17)

NHS (1)

NIH (2)

northfield laboratories (1)

Notre Dame (1)

NUBC (1)

nurse (1)

nutraceuticals (1)

nutrition (1)

NYT (2)

NYU (1)

Obama (5)

obesity (12)

octomom (1)

octuplets (3)

Olympics (2)

online (1)

oprah (1)

organ donation (19)

organ sales (5)

organ transplants (18)

pain managment (2)

pandemics (8)

parents (1)

partner notification (1)

patient rights (4)

patients (7)

Paul Wolpe (1)

payment (1)

peer-review (1)

Perfect Baby (1)

personalized medicine (4)

Peter Singer (1)

PGD (1)

pharmaceuticals (24)

pharmacists (5)

philanthropy (1)

philosophy (5)

physician assisted suicide (3)

placebo (1)

planned parenthood (1)

podcasts (1)

policy (7)

politics (69)

polyheme (1)

popularized science (11)

pregnancy (5)

premiums (1)

President Obama (2)

prison (1)

privacy (12)

pro-life (1)

provigil (1)

psychology (8)

public health (30)

public opinion (3)

quality improvement (1)

radiology (1)

ranking (1)

rationing (2)

records (1)

reform (1)

regulation (13)

religion (7)

Reloxin (1)

reproduction (22)

reproductive technology (21)

research (31)

research ethics (26)

research funding (3)

residency (2)

review board (1)

Rick Weiss (1)

robots (10)

rss (1)

Sarah Palin (1)

SCHIP (1)

scholarship (4)

school (1)

science (2)

sex (4)

sex education (2)

sleep (2)

smoking (4)

Snuppy (1)

social networking (1)

South Korea (3)

space (1)

sperm donation (6)

sports (7)

Stanford University (1)

state regulation (18)

STD (1)

stem (1)

stem cell research (8)

stem cells (71)

stroke (1)

surgeon general (1)

surgery (2)

swine (13)

synthetic biology (10)

taxes (3)

technology (9)

teenagers (1)

telemedicine (1)

television (7)

terminal illness (1)

terrorism (1)

Texas (4)

The Scientist (4)

therapy (2)

tobacco (1)

Today Show (3)

torture (1)

transgenic (1)

transplantation (3)

Twitter (1)

UK (2)

UMBC (1)

undergraduate (1)

uninsured (1)

University of Pennsylvania (1)

vaccines (17)

vatican (1)

veterans affairs (1)

veterans day (1)

video (1)

voting (1)

war (1)

war on terror (1)

Washington Post (1)

weather (1)

Wesley Smith (1)

WHO (1)

women (10)

work (1)

xenograft (1)

yuck factor (3)

Zoloth (1)