Entries from blog.bioethics.net tagged with 'research funding'

Didn't You Just Know This Was True? Vicks May Be Bad For You

How many of you have the urge upon reading this headline "Vicks Might Make Kids Sicker" to immediately forward the article to your mother and say, "See I told you so all those years ago! I knew that nasty stuff was making me feel worse!!" Actually, those noxious fumes radiating... (read the rest)

NIH recognizes undiagnosed diseases

By Ricki Lewis If TV’s Dr. House, diagnostician extraordinaire, is ever truly stumped, he can refer his patient to the National Institutes of Health’s new "Undiagnosed Diseases Program." Health care providers will refer patients whose symptoms do not fit any known pattern, and the agency will invite some of them... (read the rest)

Glenn McGee in The Scientist: What is your brain worth?

In his column for October, Glenn argues that we should be careful about how we spend money on brain research: According to two European epidemiological studies, approximately one-third of disease resources are spent on neurological disorders, including Parkinson's disease, dementia, and stroke. According to the Alzheimer's Association, someone develops the... (read the rest)

feed these results

If you use an RSS reader, you can subscribe to a feed of all future entries from blog.bioethics.net tagged 'research funding'. [What is this?]

Subscribe to feed Subscribe to feed

tags from blog.bioethics.net

abortion (9)

Abraham Lincoln (1)

academia (8)

academic publishing (6)

addiction (3)

Africa (2)

aging (2)

agriculture (1)

airlines (1)

AJOB (22)

AJOB Neuroscience (1)

AJOB Primary Research (1)

alcohol (1)

allergies (1)

ALS (1)

Alta Charo (1)

AMA (2)

American Journal of Bioethics (6)

Andrew Wakefield (1)

animals (16)

anorexia (1)

anthrax (1)

APA (1)

archaeology (1)

Art Caplan (26)

artificial intelligence (2)

ASBH (3)

assisted reproduction (1)

athletics (1)

autism (9)

award (1)

Barack Obama (1)

basic research (1)

beyond genetics (1)

bias (1)

BIID (1)

BioEdge (1)

bioethics (32)

bioethics.net (17)

biotechnology (6)

bioterrorism (1)

birth weight (1)

blog.bioethics.net (10)

blogs (3)

BMJ (2)

book (1)

brain-computer interface (1)

breast cancer (4)

Britain (1)

business ethics (1)

cadavers (1)

California (2)

Canada (1)

cancer (3)

caregiver (1)

Catholic chuch (3)

CDC (2)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1)

cessation (1)

cheating (1)

chemistry (1)

chemotherapy (2)

children (31)

chimeras (5)

China (6)

chocolate (1)

Christian (1)

cigarettes (1)

civil rights (1)

clinical ethics (5)

clinical trials (8)

cloning (18)

Coast IRB (1)

COBRA (1)

commission (2)

conferences (1)

conflict of interest (6)

consumer (1)

contraception (1)

cord blood (1)

cosmetic surgery (4)

cosmetics (1)

courts (1)

CPR (1)

Craig Venter (8)

crime (1)

databases (3)

death (4)

death penalty (5)

dementia (1)

democracy (1)

Democrats (1)

dental health (1)

developing countries (7)

development (1)

devices (1)

diabetes (1)

disability (1)

diversity (1)

DNA (4)

DNR (2)

doctors (41)

donation (1)

drug abuse (2)

e-card (1)

eating disorders (1)

economics (3)

education (1)

egg donation (5)

eggs for research (1)

elderly (1)

election 2008 (15)

electronic health records (1)

Elsevier (4)

embryos (13)

emergencies (2)

emergency research (1)

empirical bioethics (2)

employment (1)

end of life (4)

enhancement (25)

environment (3)

epidemics (1)

epidemiology (2)

ethical (1)

ethicist (2)

ethics (28)

Europe (1)

euthanasia (3)

evolution (3)

exercise (1)

Ezekiel Emanuel (1)

face (1)

facebook (4)

families (3)

FDA (18)

federalism (2)

fertility tourism (1)

flight simulators (1)

fMRI (2)

following up (1)

food (17)

food ethics (6)

forensics (1)

funding (2)

games (1)

gay rights (1)

gender (4)

gender theory (1)

gene therapy (3)

genetic disease (9)

genetic engineering (1)

genetic modification (5)

genetic testing (26)

genetics (24)

genomics (12)

Geron (1)

glenn mcgee (2)

Glenn McGee (15)

Google (1)

government (5)

Harvard (2)

healing (1)

health (16)

health 2.0 (1)

health insurance (27)

health reform (18)

healthcare (40)

hearing (1)

heart attack (2)

HIV/AIDS (3)

holocaust (1)

hospitals (8)

human rights (1)

humanities (1)

humans (1)

Hurricane Katrina (1)

Hwang Woo-suk (2)

Ian Wilmut (1)

illness (1)

industry (7)

infants (1)

infectious disease (12)

influenza (18)

informed consent (3)

injury (1)

Institute of Medicine (1)

insurance (2)

international (7)

internet (8)

interview (1)

iphone (2)

iPS cells (19)

Iran (1)

IRB (2)

IVF (2)

James Fossett (1)

John McCain (1)

Johns Hopkins (2)

Johns Hopkins University (1)

Joseph Biden (3)

journalism (2)

Kevorkian (2)

kidneys (2)

law (15)

legislation (2)

Leon Kass (1)

liberty (1)

license (1)

living donors (1)

longevity (2)

lying (1)

March of Dimes (1)

Marfan syndrome (1)

marriage (1)

massage (1)

masters degree (1)

media (13)

medical devices (5)

medical education (3)

medical ethics (10)

medical marijuana (2)

medical schools (11)

Medicare (2)

medicine (5)

memory (1)

mental illness (2)

MercatorNet (1)

Merck (4)

military (1)

Mitt Romney (1)

mobile (1)

models (2)

money (3)

Montana (1)

morality (3)

multiple births (1)

nanotechnology (18)

neuroethics (20)

neuroimaging (2)

neuromarketing (2)

neuroscience (27)

New York (1)

news (1)

news top 5 (17)

NHS (1)

NIH (2)

northfield laboratories (1)

Notre Dame (1)

NUBC (1)

nurse (1)

nutraceuticals (1)

nutrition (1)

NYT (2)

NYU (1)

Obama (5)

obesity (12)

octomom (1)

octuplets (3)

Olympics (2)

online (1)

oprah (1)

organ donation (19)

organ sales (5)

organ transplants (18)

pain managment (2)

pandemics (8)

parents (1)

partner notification (1)

patient rights (4)

patients (7)

Paul Wolpe (1)

payment (1)

peer-review (1)

Perfect Baby (1)

personalized medicine (4)

Peter Singer (1)

PGD (1)

pharmaceuticals (24)

pharmacists (5)

philanthropy (1)

philosophy (5)

physician assisted suicide (3)

placebo (1)

planned parenthood (1)

podcasts (1)

policy (7)

politics (69)

polyheme (1)

popularized science (11)

pregnancy (5)

premiums (1)

President Obama (2)

prison (1)

privacy (12)

pro-life (1)

provigil (1)

psychology (8)

public health (30)

public opinion (3)

quality improvement (1)

radiology (1)

ranking (1)

rationing (2)

records (1)

reform (1)

regulation (13)

religion (7)

Reloxin (1)

reproduction (22)

reproductive technology (21)

research (31)

research ethics (26)

research funding (3)

residency (2)

review board (1)

Rick Weiss (1)

robots (10)

rss (1)

Sarah Palin (1)

SCHIP (1)

scholarship (4)

school (1)

science (2)

sex (4)

sex education (2)

sleep (2)

smoking (4)

Snuppy (1)

social networking (1)

South Korea (3)

space (1)

sperm donation (6)

sports (7)

Stanford University (1)

state regulation (18)

STD (1)

stem (1)

stem cell research (8)

stem cells (71)

stroke (1)

surgeon general (1)

surgery (2)

swine (13)

synthetic biology (10)

taxes (3)

technology (9)

teenagers (1)

telemedicine (1)

television (7)

terminal illness (1)

terrorism (1)

Texas (4)

The Scientist (4)

therapy (2)

tobacco (1)

Today Show (3)

torture (1)

transgenic (1)

transplantation (3)

Twitter (1)

UK (2)

UMBC (1)

undergraduate (1)

uninsured (1)

University of Pennsylvania (1)

vaccines (17)

vatican (1)

veterans affairs (1)

veterans day (1)

video (1)

voting (1)

war (1)

war on terror (1)

Washington Post (1)

weather (1)

Wesley Smith (1)

WHO (1)

women (10)

work (1)

xenograft (1)

yuck factor (3)

Zoloth (1)